Dachau becomes a tourist attraction 1959

Once again here with the marvellous appearing and disappearing Dachau Gas Chamber. This article from December 14th 1959 tells of the horror and deception of the gas chamber. Me thinks it is us who are being deceived.

Dachau Gas Chamber
Birmingham Daily Post – Monday 14 December 1959

 

Yet again here is the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s take on the mythical gas chamber.
https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005214

Barrack X
USHMM Dachau

Here is the headline from the article

Dachau now a tourist trap
Birmingham Daily Post – Monday 14 December 1959

Full text reads

Dachau Concentration Camp Now a Tourist Attraction The notice on the barbedwire-topped wall at Dachau. near Munich, says: ” This way to the crematorium open daily from nine to five.” A wrought-iron gate opens on to the carefully-tended lawns of the Nazis’ first concentration camp, now the site of a refugee camp and a tourist attraction with no price for admission, a Reuter correspondent writes. Visitors from all over the world file past a marble sign in three languages reading “Execution range with blood ditch.” They stare at the spot where thousands of innocent men and women received “special treatment”—the Nazi euphemism for murder. Of a total of 250.000 prisoners, only 33.000 lived to be freed by the United States Army. Apart from those who were systematically exterminated. 70,000 died of starvation and disease. Now, at Dachau, the high season for tourists is In August, according to the German woman attendant who keeps the books. She said: “Last August we had 41,000 visitors. But a lot of them were disappointed. Before they go. many ask where the torture instruments were and whether they have really seen everything. Some of them say the Americans must have built the camp after 1945.•. Means of Extermination But the machinery of extermination Is still there. Near two gravestones at the execution site, one Jewish and the other Christian, lies the crematorium with its five metre 415 feet) high chimney. It still bears its Nazi designation ” Building 243 a.” The tourist route leads into an empty white-washed room with peeling wails. Although a notice warns against defacing the walls, visitors have left their marks, traces of offering, irony, hate•—and the old tourist ” we have-been-there ” pride. In the next room are the furnaces—still equipped with hooks and bars used to drag bodies about. Then come the rooms where those who were to die were forced to undress. and the so-called ” shower room “—the gas chamber itself. To ensure smooth progress of exterminations, prisoners were told they were to be given showers. They did not know their fate until poison gas started to flood the chamber. Dachau camp to-day has a veneer of prosperity and well being which underlines the horror of its past, for many of the 1.600 refugees from former German territories in Eastern Europe who live there are fairly prosperous. want to leave because of the low rents.” Father Leo Roth, a Dominican priest responsible for the spiritual care of Catholics in the little refugee community, said: “It is a disgrace that people still live in a concentration camp 14 years after the end of the war.” The Dominican, himself a Dachau prisoner from 1942 until the end of the war, said the refugees paid only six marks 10 pfennigs a month for a room (about 10e. sterling). But most of them earned about as much as the average German. Father Roth, supported by the International Dachau Committee of Brussels, is waging a campaign for the maintenance of Dachau in a manner respectful to the memories of the men and women who died there. He said the committee had succeeded this year in stopping several abuses. Its action had resulted in the removal of a delicatessen shop from the concentration camp’s former post-mortem chamber, a butcher’s shop from the camp hospital and a dance hall from one of the rooms where Prisoners used to wait for execution. The hut set aside for Inmates who contracted typhus is to-day and an elementary school for the refugees’ children.

 

Advertisements

Holocaust Denial before Holocaust Denial was a thing.

Dachau gas chamber truth

Birmingham Daily Post – Thursday 29 September 1960

Dachua gas chambers, the horror version of Brigadoon. Did they exist or didn’t they? in this article the German authorities of 1960 are threatening to sue a former German general employed by the US military for exposing that the so called Dachau gas chamber were created after the war. Imagine my shock at such a claim. The German (puppet) authorities were insistent that there was a lethal gas chamber at Dachau that exterminated Jews. Nowadays the great temple of Holocaustianity  declares that there is no convincing evidence of anyone being gassed at Dachau.

I wonder when the day will come when they admit that there were no homicidal gas chambers at any German internment camp.

The Balfour Declaration, A receipt for services rendered?

Balfour Declaration
A receipt by the Allies to World Jewry for help to win WW1

Northern Whig – Thursday 09 August 1923

It is 100 years ago today since the Balfour declaration was made to Lord Rothschild. Here is a little more information not so openly known by the general public on this pledge.

The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British government during World War I announcing support for the establishment of a “national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a minority Jewish population. It read:

His Majesty’s government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

The declaration was contained in a letter dated 2 November 1917 from the United Kingdom’s Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Walter Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. The text of the declaration was published in the press on 9 November 1917.

Now why would the British Empire in the midst of the greatest war in history just suddenly decide to make such a gesture to the Jewish people?

Was is just out of magnanimity? was is just because they thought it was the right thing to do? Was it just from pester power by the Zionist movement?

Or was it a receipt for services rendered?

This is from an article by Sir Martin Conway MP

Text reads:

THE BALFOUR DECLARATION

The general public does not realise that the idea of the Balfour Declaration was of slow growth, and that it only took form after long and minute discussion. ‘To recapitulate the negotiations here would wearisome, and is not necessary. The leaders of the Zionist movement were introduced to Mr. Lloyd George in 1914 and from that time onward discussions continued. Schemes were put forward, modified, developed. Various versions the ultimate formula were suggested, criticised, rejected, replaced, till finally one was agreed on. and was put into the mouth Mr. Balfour, who gave official utterance it on behalf of the British Government November 2nd 1917. It ran follows;- His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of that object, being clearly I understood that nothing shall done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the right and political status enjoyed by the Jews in any other country.”
No act of State could have been more formal. The honour of the British Government and people was pledged, and so remains, and must remain. The suggestion that such pledge can be lightly set aside and disregarded can only come from light-minded journalists and irresponsible talkers. The pledge was accepted; The goods were delivered. The Jewish community all over the world backed the Allies. America came into the war. In the words of The “Case against Zionism,” ‘ During the world war it (the pledge) insured for the Allies the loyalty and financial support the Jews all over the world, and assured England of a permanent suzerainty over the Southern portion of Syria for the protection of the Suez Canal, which is the spinal cord of England’s colonistic Empire.’* Great Britain, therefore, can by no possibility back on the Balfour Declaration. Whatever the future relations of Britain to Palestine may be, the Declaration must remain one of the pivots of our Imperial policy. What we have promised and must perform. There were, however, other promises made, and these also have to kept.

Here is another example from a little known politician called Winston Churchill

Balfour declaration on Jews and Palestine, Zionism

Western Daily Press – Wednesday 05 July 1922

Extended text reads:

Mr Churchill said this was a topic that easily lent itself to prejudice. When they had a Jew, a Russian, Bolshevism, Zionism, electrical monopoly and Government concessions presented at the. same moment even the recently budding statesman could make a very fine case. There was. broadly speaking. two issues, and it was important to keep them distinct. The first was were they to keep pledge to their pledge to the Zionists which were made in 1917 to the effect that the Government their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of national home for Jewish people or were they to abandon that. The second issue was whether the measures taken Colonial Office to fulfil the pledge were reasonable and proper measures. On the first issue the House as a whole had definitely committed itself on more than one occasion the general proposition that they should use their best endeavours to make good the pledge to the Zionists. The pledge was made to gain the support, in winning the war, of Jews all over the world. Parliament had deliberately accepted the peace arrangements that bad been made , including the acceptance by Great Britain of mandatory responsibility for Palestine- Balfour declaration was part of the mandatory system.

Was this the stab in the back oft referred to by the Nazis?

Here is a more eloquent take on it

 

 

 

 

 

Wooden gas chambers at Auschwitz?

Auschwitz wooden hut gas chamber
Wooden gas chamber?

Daily Herald – Monday 27 February 1961

This is from an article about Auschwitz survivor Rudolf Vrba. He goes on to claim that the entire reason for mass extermination was just to rob Jews of their belongings and to turn their hair and body parts into commodities for the German economy and for growing SS vegetables.

SS vegetable gardens
SS vegetables

If one didn’t know better you’d think he could have been making these things up.